Saturday, February 29, 2020

A Lack of Tech-Friendly Policies Means US Could Loose Its Lead Essay Sample

The article â€Å"A Lack of Tech-Friendly Policies Means US Could Loose Its Lead† provides relevant treatment about deficiency of proper proficient inventions in the state. It is argued that the state strongly lacks proficient geographic expeditions. new in-migration workers policy and more low-cost instruction. The writer references that the US is a state with tremendous resources. venture capital and the best universities. but the state should move quicker to keep world’s taking place in technological domain. I think that the article is really of import for country’s policy because it highlights current jobs and challenges. Nowadays engineerings are fleetly developing in many Asiatic states. particularly in China. Japan and Korea. and. in my sentiment. the US authorities should pay more attending to policies which encourage and promote technological inventions and scientific geographic expeditions in the energetic field. Actually. the state has adept applied scientists to interchange information and proper resources to use. It goes without stating that the US is really powerful state in all domains. but nowadays the country’s authorities wages attending to contending terrorist act. war in Iraq. and racial favoritism and neglects the bedrock of economic issues which are considered the nucleus of country’s fight at the world’s scene. I agree with the writer that â€Å"innovation starts from education† . and the fact that â€Å"too many pupils are dropping out of school. and excessively few are analyzing math and science† is truly dissatisfactory for me. I think that making more occupations. actuating pupils to larn. and increasing productiveness will excite technological development of the state. The writer is really persuasive as he offers relevant grounds and claims of cardinal political figures to escalate the feeling and do people cognizant of bing jobs. However. I don’t like the thoughts of working out new atom bombs. Space missions. in my sentiment. are of import as they help to understand our universe better.

Thursday, February 13, 2020

Moral views in the development of English law Essay

Moral views in the development of English law - Essay Example 123), which calls upon a legal community's moral judgment in determining what is aptly, the common good. Moreover, within the context of English Law, this relationship is further emphasised in the role that judges play in the development of precedents embodied within case law. Thus, it is within this context that this essay aims to analyse the significance that moral views have played, if they did, in the development of English Law. As this essay will argue, moral views have played a significant role in the development of English laws, due to the consideration that the legal community has given to the collective standards of morality accepted by the English society in creating legislations, statutes, and EC (European Council) Directives; and the discretion of judges in developing precedents in common law. To prove this point, the essay will begin by presenting the sources of English Law. It will then illustrate the manner that legislations, statutes, and EC Directives are reflective of societal perceptions of morality; and the extent of judges' discretion in case law. Lastly, the essay will illustrate the role morals have played in the development of English law, as well as the effect it has had the law's legal development, before ending with concluding statements. Under English Law, legal development proceeds through a number of instruments such as precedent through courts, legislation through the UK parliament, and as a result of European legislation through directives and decisions of the European Union court adopted by the government. What is apparent among these sources is the degree of discretionary power given both to the individual judges under common law in terms of interpretation, such that disputes can be resolved in a manner that can be either just or unjust; and to the legal community in terms of legislation, which is affected by the individual judgment of each member, as well - both of which will be discussed in following sections. What is imperative as this point, however, is the need to distinguish between morality and moral views, such that while morality refers to some conventional conception of right or wrong; moral views, which is the topic of this essay, refers to the individual standards adhered to by individual judges an d members of the parliament, as well as legislators of Community law. Thus, in order to illustrate that moral views are significant in the development of laws, one must simply illustrate that discretion is evident in the legal development of English Law, regardless if this legal development is moral or not. In this respect, this essay argues that the significance of moral views are evident in the way that English Law can both either be just or unjust, depending on the consensus of legislators' moral views regarding the common good; and the moral judgment of case law judges in interpreting these rules. English Law and the Common Good The Parliament consists of the Crown, the elected House of Common and the Unelected House of Lords. As Sir E. Coke claims, it is "the highest and most honourable and absolute Court of Justice in England,' and its 'jurisdiction' is 'so transcendent' that it can make and repeal laws on any subject matter and its honour and justice cannot be doubted" (cited in Walters 2003). This is also echoed by Austin, claiming that "the sovereign, or supreme legislator, is the author of all law"

Saturday, February 1, 2020

Criminal Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Criminal - Case Study Example This will ensure that there is an efficient trial which is aimed to bring across justice. Criminal law deals with crimes and the legal punishments of criminal offences under the body of statutory and common law. A peaceful social order and justice is achieved in the society by imposing sanction of the crime. Criminal justice is governed by four theories namely: punishment, incapacitation, deterrence and rehabilitation. 1 A crime is an act of default or conduct prejudicial to the community, the commission of which by law renders the person responsible liable to be prosecuted and eventually punishing the guilty person accordingly. The prosecutor has a duty of bring the charges against the accused person and prove establish his guilty beyond any reasonable doubts. The prosecution for crime is conduct in the name of the state and the case is styled as - State versus name of the accused. (Van de Haag, 1978) Whereas civil law deals with the relationship between an individual and their rights and obligations under the law, criminal law is a system of regulating the behaviours of persons in relation to societal norms. A criminal proceeding commences with an alleged crime whereby an accusation is made by the compliant and the police being the government agent investigates the matter. During the proceedings, the interest of the government is represented by the prosecuting attorney or prosecutor while those of the defendant are represented by his defence attorney or by himself. 2 An exact circumstance that comprises a crime is supposed to be spelt out by the criminal statute in what is known as the element of the offence. The defendant cannot be proved to be guilty of the offence unless the prosecuting authority proves the elements of the offence spelt out in the criminal statute. Three elements of the offence are: the act itself, the actus reus, guilty act; the requisite mental state, the mens rea, guilty mind; and the attendant circumstances. (Fletcher, 1998) For our case, Arnold who was a member of an anti-capitalist organisation committed to the violent overthrow of society is a criminal offence when he released a toxic gas into the underground rail system of a city. This is a public nuisance which is actionable at the suit of the prosecutor on behalf of the public. A public nuisance can be defined as an act which interferes with the enjoyment of a right whereby all member of the society are entitled to for example right to fresh air or travel on the highway or rail. (Langhan, 1999) Arnold endangered the life of passengers using the railway system with the toxic case hence he should be prosecuted for public nuisance. The remedies in nuisance are damages, injunction and abatement. Damages This is an ordinary common law remedy whereby the damages claimed are un-liquidated as the court has power to fix them. Injunction This is an equitable remedy which is granted at the discretion of the court circumstances